Data
Breast-Cancer-Wisconsin-(Prognostic)-Data-Set

Breast-Cancer-Wisconsin-(Prognostic)-Data-Set

active ARFF Database: Open Database, Contents: Database Contents Visibility: public Uploaded 24-03-2022 by Dustin Carrion
0 likes downloaded by 0 people , 0 total downloads 0 issues 0 downvotes
Issue #Downvotes for this reason By


Loading wiki
Help us complete this description Edit
Context Data From: UCI Machine Learning Repository http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/breast-cancer-wisconsin/wpbc.names Content "Each record represents follow-up data for one breast cancer case. These are consecutive patients seen by Dr. Wolberg since 1984, and include only those cases exhibiting invasive breast cancer and no evidence of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. The first 30 features are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle aspirate (FNA) of a breast mass. They describe characteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image. A few of the images can be found at http://www.cs.wisc.edu/street/images/ The separation described above was obtained using Multisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, "Decision Tree Construction Via Linear Programming." Proceedings of the 4th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society, pp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear programming to construct a decision tree. Relevant features were selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4 features and 1-3 separating planes. The actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane in the 3-dimensional space is that described in: [K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: "Robust Linear Programming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets", Optimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34]. The Recurrence Surface Approximation (RSA) method is a linear programming model which predicts Time To Recur using both recurrent and nonrecurrent cases. See references (i) and (ii) above for details of the RSA method. This database is also available through the UW CS ftp server: ftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu cd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WPBC/ 1) ID number 2) Outcome (R = recur, N = nonrecur) 3) Time (recurrence time if field 2 = R, disease-free time if field 2 = N) 4-33) Ten real-valued features are computed for each cell nucleus: a) radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter) b) texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values) c) perimeter d) area e) smoothness (local variation in radius lengths) f) compactness (perimeter2 / area - 1.0) g) concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour) h) concave points (number of concave portions of the contour) i) symmetry j) fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)" Acknowledgements Creators: Dr. William H. Wolberg, General Surgery Dept., University of Wisconsin, Clinical Sciences Center, Madison, WI 53792 wolbergeagle.surgery.wisc.edu W. Nick Street, Computer Sciences Dept., University of Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706 streetcs.wisc.edu 608-262-6619 Olvi L. Mangasarian, Computer Sciences Dept., University of Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706 olvics.wisc.edu Inspiration I'm really interested in trying out various machine learning algorithms on some real life science data.

32 features

id (ignore)numeric569 unique values
0 missing
diagnosisstring2 unique values
0 missing
radius_meannumeric456 unique values
0 missing
texture_meannumeric479 unique values
0 missing
perimeter_meannumeric522 unique values
0 missing
area_meannumeric539 unique values
0 missing
smoothness_meannumeric474 unique values
0 missing
compactness_meannumeric537 unique values
0 missing
concavity_meannumeric537 unique values
0 missing
concave_points_meannumeric542 unique values
0 missing
symmetry_meannumeric432 unique values
0 missing
fractal_dimension_meannumeric499 unique values
0 missing
radius_senumeric540 unique values
0 missing
texture_senumeric519 unique values
0 missing
perimeter_senumeric533 unique values
0 missing
area_senumeric528 unique values
0 missing
smoothness_senumeric547 unique values
0 missing
compactness_senumeric541 unique values
0 missing
concavity_senumeric533 unique values
0 missing
concave_points_senumeric507 unique values
0 missing
symmetry_senumeric498 unique values
0 missing
fractal_dimension_senumeric545 unique values
0 missing
radius_worstnumeric457 unique values
0 missing
texture_worstnumeric511 unique values
0 missing
perimeter_worstnumeric514 unique values
0 missing
area_worstnumeric544 unique values
0 missing
smoothness_worstnumeric411 unique values
0 missing
compactness_worstnumeric529 unique values
0 missing
concavity_worstnumeric539 unique values
0 missing
concave_points_worstnumeric492 unique values
0 missing
symmetry_worstnumeric500 unique values
0 missing
fractal_dimension_worstnumeric535 unique values
0 missing
Unnamed:_32numeric0 unique values
569 missing

19 properties

569
Number of instances (rows) of the dataset.
32
Number of attributes (columns) of the dataset.
Number of distinct values of the target attribute (if it is nominal).
569
Number of missing values in the dataset.
569
Number of instances with at least one value missing.
31
Number of numeric attributes.
0
Number of nominal attributes.
0.06
Number of attributes divided by the number of instances.
96.88
Percentage of numeric attributes.
Percentage of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
0
Percentage of nominal attributes.
Number of instances belonging to the most frequent class.
Percentage of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
Number of instances belonging to the least frequent class.
0
Number of binary attributes.
0
Percentage of binary attributes.
100
Percentage of instances having missing values.
Average class difference between consecutive instances.
3.13
Percentage of missing values.

0 tasks

Define a new task